TORONTO, November 17, 2014 – New research by Professor Aaron Dhir of York University’s Osgoode Hall Law School offers compelling insights into the role law can play in addressing the lack of gender diversity in corporate boardrooms.
In his forthcoming book, Challenging Boardroom Homogeneity, to be published by Cambridge University Press in February, Dhir analyzes the homogeneity of corporate boards around the world and the two main ways in which law has been used to address this heated topic of debate. He compares the U.S. model of diversity disclosure with the Norwegian quota model, revealing stark contrasts.
Dhir examines the disclosures that the S&P 100 submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission after the SEC implemented a rule in 2010 requiring companies to report on whether they consider diversity in nominating directors. He finds that since the SEC provides no definition of the term “diversity,” corporations most frequently define the term with reference to a director’s prior experience rather than his or her socio-demographic characteristics. The SEC rule thus gives firms little reason to think seriously about the socio-demographic composition of their boards.
By contrast, Dhir’s study of the Norwegian quota model reveals a strategy that has produced very different results. Norway was the first country to enact a board diversity quota and today women in the country hold 40.5 percent of board positions. While speculation about the effects of corporate board quotas abounds, Dhir, who interviewed Norwegian corporate directors about their experiences under Norway’s controversial law, replaces the conjecture with an account of real-life boardroom reality.
“The lack of gender parity in the governance of business corporations has ignited intense global debate, leading policymakers to wrestle with difficult questions that lie at the intersection of market activity and social identity politics,” says Dhir, who is currently a Visiting Professor of Law at Yale Law School.
“Regulators globally are now debating what paths to pursue to diversify the upper echelons of their corporate sectors. Canada is no exception. Just last month, the Ontario Securities Commission and eight other provincial and territorial securities regulators announced new disclosure rules that will require Canadian firms to be more forthcoming about the inclusion of women in their governance structures. At the same time, a bill currently under consideration in the Canadian Senate seeks to mandate gender parity in corporate boardrooms.”
Dhir’s research findings are generating considerable media attention ahead of the publication of his book, including coverage in the New York Times, Forbes, and ThinkProgress. Journalists are welcome to access three preview chapters from the book, available for download here:
Dhir can be reached for comment at: firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com
York University is helping to shape the global thinkers and thinking that will define tomorrow. York U’s unwavering commitment to excellence reflects a rich diversity of perspectives and a strong sense of social responsibility that sets us apart. A York U degree empowers graduates to thrive in the world and achieve their life goals through a rigorous academic foundation balanced by real-world experiential education. As a globally recognized research centre, York U is fully engaged in the critical discussions that lead to innovative solutions to the most pressing local and global social challenges. York U’s 11 faculties and 27 research centres are thinking bigger, broader and more globally, partnering with 288 leading universities worldwide. York U’s community is strong − 55,000 students, 7,000 faculty and staff, and more than 275,000 alumni.
Virginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, firstname.lastname@example.org