The study examined corporate and union funding of candidates during the 2006 municipal elections in Toronto, Ajax, Brampton, Markham, Mississauga, Oshawa, Pickering, Richmond Hill, Vaughan, and Whitby. It found that the development industry was by far the most important financier of the majority of winning candidates’ campaigns in these cities, with the exceptions of Toronto and Ajax.

When corporations trump citizens, the results are unsustainable urban sprawl, high transportation costs, environmental degradation, and a weak sense of community that undermines political organization, MacDermid writes.

“There’s no question that electoral reform is needed in order to address this imbalance and ensure the interests of citizens are represented,” he says. “The City of Toronto has the opportunity to take the lead in municipal campaign finance reform by voting to ban contributions from corporations and unions. But the Ontario Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing is the only one who can make the radical changes needed in the Municipal Elections Act."

The study includes a detailed analysis of decision-making in Vaughan, where elected councillors frequently voted on development proposals submitted by corporations who financed their campaigns. Councillors often avoided public accountability by taking advantage of the opportunity for unrecorded votes, MacDermid found.

The study proposes a number of reforms, including:

• A ban on the carrying forward of surpluses
• Limits on how many campaigns an individual can contribute to
• Requiring contributors to reside in the municipality and be of voting age
• Controls for campaign spending by groups other than candidates
• Removal of a section of the Municipal Elections Act that allows companies and unions to pay campaign volunteers without it being considered a contribution

However, MacDermid notes that the deep connections between development and municipal politics require more than campaign finance reforms to undo.

“Citizen engagement in the political process is an important part of any potential solution. For example, in the City of Toronto, contributions from individuals are the key source of support for municipal politicians, and that's partly due to higher levels of citizen mobilization,” he says.

MacDermid also believes political parties have an important role to play. “Excluding [parties] creates a David and Goliath scenario of developer versus community. Developers are highly-organized, and only political parties have the muscle to organize against them.”

The study is published in partnership with the Centre for Social Justice Foundation for Research and Education, and VoteToronto. For a copy of the study, click here .

 
Media contact:

Melissa Hughes, Media Relations, York University: 416 736 2100 x22097, mehughes@yorku.ca

York University is the leading interdisciplinary research and teaching university in Canada. York offers a modern, academic experience at the undergraduate and graduate level in Toronto, Canada’s most international city. The third largest university in the country, York is host to a dynamic academic community of 50,000 students and 7,000 faculty and staff, as well as more than 200,000 alumni worldwide. York’s 11 faculties and 26 research centres conduct ambitious, groundbreaking research that is interdisciplinary, cutting across traditional academic boundaries. This distinctive and collaborative approach is preparing students for the future and bringing fresh insights and solutions to real-world challenges. York University is an autonomous, not-for-profit corporation.

-30-